Degradation trajectories, vibration zones, bearing temperature, current, and RUL-oriented fields
Synthetic predictive maintenance datasets for condition monitoring
Predictive Maintenance records provide time-series signals for degradation, vibration, bearing temperature, electrical current, and remaining-useful-life research workflows.
Engine maturity
Experimental Engine — Under Scientific Review
This domain is an early-stage research prototype. Its models, units, temporal behaviour, and event semantics are being audited. Outputs should not be treated as empirically validated observations.
engine 3.2.0 · maturity experimental · validation audit_pending
Research scope
The records support modelling experiments and teaching. They do not represent a calibrated copy of a specific industrial fleet or machine installation.
Synthetic condition-monitoring data for anomaly detection and reliability studies
Column schema
Every record in this domain emits the same 14 columns . Types and ranges below are read from the generator itself, so they cannot drift from the files it produces.
| Column | Type | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Timestamp | datetime | — |
| Machine_ID | string | — |
| Machine_Type | categorical | — |
| Temperature_C | float | 20, 150 |
| Vibration_mm_s | float | 0.1, 30 |
| Current_A | float | 0.5, 50 |
| Pressure_kPa | float | 0, 1200 |
| RPM | integer | 0, 5000 |
| Noise_dB | float | 40, 120 |
| Oil_Temp_C | float | 20, 120 |
| Operating_Hours | integer | 0, 100000 |
| Degradation_Index | float | 0, 1 |
| RUL_Hours | integer | 0, 100000 |
| Machine_Status | categorical | — |
Generative models
Values come from explicit equations, not from a trained generative model. Each component below is documented in the methodology.
Degradation
D(t) = 1 - exp(-(t/L)^beta) with Weibull shape beta between 1.8 and 3.0.
Vibration
ISO 10816Vibration severity zones coupled to the health index.
Coupled signals
Temperature, current and pressure driven by the same underlying degradation state.
Remaining useful life
RUL derived directly from the degradation trajectory, giving exact supervised targets.
Research uses
The common thread is known ground truth: the generator records the true state alongside the observation of it, which a real deployment cannot supply.
Remaining-useful-life regression with exact RUL labels
Early-fault detection benchmarking
Survival analysis across controllable degradation rates
Class-imbalance experiments with tunable failure frequency
Compared with measured datasets
Measured datasets in this area remain the reference for site realism. A generator answers a different question: what a method does when the true state is known and the scenario can be set deliberately. These are complements, not substitutes.
| Measured dataset | What it provides | What a generated record adds |
|---|---|---|
| NASA C-MAPSS | Turbofan engine degradation simulation with RUL targets. | Tunable degradation shape and failure prevalence across many seeds. |
| MetroPT | Metro train compressor sensor readings with failure reports. | Exact degradation index at every step, not only the failure timestamps. |
| AI4I 2020 | Synthetic milling-machine maintenance benchmark. | Six coupled sensor channels plus a documented Weibull degradation model. |
Scope and limits
What is currently established
- — The generator runs and emits its declared column contract.
- — Output is deterministic for a given domain, parameter set and seed.
- — Scientific audit of its models, units, temporal behaviour and event semantics is still outstanding.
What it does not establish
- — Site realism, or transfer to any specific real deployment.
- — Calibration against a named site, sensor network, fleet or population.
Browse Predictive Maintenance generated records
Each card links to the original citable record. IoTSyn keeps that URL, its dataset file, and its citation guidance unchanged.
Predictive Maintenance Dataset
10,000 rows · published May 21, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
10,000 rows · published Apr 6, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
100 rows · published Apr 4, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
1,000 rows · published Apr 4, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
100 rows · published Mar 23, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
4,000 rows · published Mar 21, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
100 rows · published Mar 20, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
100 rows · published Mar 20, 2026
Open original dataset record →Predictive Maintenance Dataset
100 rows · published Mar 20, 2026
Open original dataset record →Frequently asked questions
What degradation model is used?
A Weibull degradation curve D(t) = 1 - exp(-(t/L)^beta) with shape parameter beta between 1.8 and 3.0, with vibration severity zones following ISO 10816.
Does this represent a specific machine fleet?
No. The records support modelling experiments and teaching. They are not a calibrated copy of any industrial installation.
Is remaining useful life labelled?
Yes. RUL_Hours and Degradation_Index are emitted alongside the sensor channels, giving supervised targets with exact ground truth.
Can failure frequency be tuned?
Yes. Scenario parameters control degradation rate, which makes the class balance of failure events adjustable for imbalance experiments.